So, I’m enrolled in online school, and taking my first couple of classes.
One of my first classes is basically a “How to go to college” class, which covers some diverse topics as time and stress management, academic writing, reading strategies, and most recently – critical thinking.
As part of the assignment for critical thinking, I am tasked with reading some academic articles (of my choosing) and writing about them. Since I am in an IT program, it is recommended that the articles have something to do with IT.
So, I found: http://meaningfulplay.msu.edu/proceedings2008/mp2008_paper_66.pdf
I picked an article on games…. go figure.
For a while, when initially reading this article, I felt like I was talking to Ron Penton.
I had to read it several times, as well as look up terms like “ergodic” and “procedural rhetoric”.
So far, I’ve about half-digested what the four page paper is saying (I think!). A lot of it looks like someone used a thesaurus bazooka on it.
In the end, I think I’m starting to get a bit of a bead on something that I didn’t really have before.
Previously, I had no appreciation for academia. I am an applied sort of guy.
I am starting to see how it is a very different world view, which has value in its own way.
I recently had a similar realization about the world view of manager-types.
So, in any case, I’m starting to be less of a “world view bigot”. Managers and adacemic folks are people too, it seems.